THE FRANKLIN SPECTATOR

Entries by Fred Keller (220)

Friday
31Jul2009

Oak Creek’s Howell Avenue Just Keeps Getting Busier and Busier And Busier… 

According to a story that recently appeared in FranklinNOW, “A bank could be the newest addition to a part of Oak Creek that promises to only get busier...”

The story reports that a yet to be named bank, is planning a one-story, 5500-square foot building in the 8100 block of S. Howell Avenue. This area of Oak Creek is already home to such popular, retail businesses as Woodman's Grocery Store, Buffalo Wild Wings, and a Sonic restaurant, which is currently under construction.

With the addition of this new bank, Oak Creek’s Plan Commission is becoming concerned about potential traffic congestion in this area of Howell Avenue; prompting Oak Creek Mayor Dick Bolender to suggest that developers take a hard look at ways to create the best possible traffic flow for the bank, which will include drive-through service.

Oak Creek’s stretch of Howell Ave. from roughly Rawson Ave., to just south of Puetz Rd., is steadily becoming what any reasonably-minded person would see as Oak Creek’s blossoming, downtown.  This view is further fueled by the fact that this same area will also include Oak Creek’s New Civic Center Development.

Here’s the $2 Billion question: What incentive do Oak Creek City leaders have to promote economic activity in the OakCreek-Franklin Joint South 27th Street Corridor Project?

At last night’s Joint 27th Street Steering Committee Meeting, I posed this question to committee members. Here is the BATTLE JOINED Livescribe recording of my comments during the citizen comment period.

Franklin Alderman Steve Olson and Oak Creek committee member, Marie Myszkowski were kind enough to respond to my comments.

 

 

Next week BATTLE JOINED will take-up, and reveal, the great folly of the 27th Street Corridor Project—from a Franklin taxpayer’s perspective—and let its readers know what Franklin’s elected officials aren’t telling you about this future, so-called “unifying place for the cities of Franklin and Oak Creek.”

Tuesday
28Jul2009

Sen. Lazich: “I support the proposed Sacred Heart at Monastery Lake in Franklin”

State Sen. Mary Lazich (R-New Berlin) enthusiastically supports Sacred Heart at Monastery Lake in Franklin, the latest Development proposed Mark Carstensen Construction.

BATTLE JOINED wrote about this proposed development last Thursday, two days after Franklin’s hometown-boy presented his project to the Franklin Common Council and Franklin citizens at the Common Council Meeting on Tuesday, July 21.

Lazich’s letter to Mayor Taylor and the Common Council—included in her July 27 blog post—does not include a date (Gee, that's weird, isn't it?), which suggests she or her aide, Franklin blogger and "City Hall-insider," Kevin Fischer, are trying to hide the fact that this letter of support was delivered July 20, the day BEFORE the proposed development was presented publicly to her constituents, the citizens of Franklin.  How’s that for government transparency? What else is transpiring behind the scenes at city hall between Lazich, other state officials, and Franklin’s elected officials?

This entire affair also begs the question: How much has Carstensen contributed to Sen. Lazich’s campaign coffers, as well as present Franklin Common Council members, including Mayor Taylor, who at the moment, is dealing with his own "campaign issues"?

Tuesday
28Jul2009

Observation Post: Fischer Pushes Father And Son Under The Bus

OBSERVING THE MOVEMENTS OF THE MISGUIDED

BATTLE JOINED has observed that in a number of recent posts questioning whether nepotism by Franklin Little League coaches, played any part in the fact that 12-year old Devin Baehr was not chosen for the Little League All-Star team, Franklin blogger and politico groupie, Kevin Fischer opined:

It’s a pretty good bet that those responsible for slighting 12-year old Devin Baehr by keeping him off the Franklin Little League All-Star team never dreamed the story would appear on a community blog and then be discussed by the most popular talk show host on Wisconsin’s most popular radio station.

One of Charlie Sykes’ callers was Franklin High School varsity baseball coach Jim Hughes who has complied over 700 career victories. Hughes told Sykes and his vast audience he had seen Devin Baehr pitch in person and that he truly deserved All-Star honors.

Hughes’ assessment is more than good enough for me.

For whatever reasons or rationale they used, the people responsible for snubbing Baehr flat out messed up. There’s something terribly wrong when the kids of various managers make the All-Star team while a deserving youngster like Baehr does not...

However, of late, we've observed that Fischer is now one of Franklin Little League’s biggest fans. So, why the “180”?

It’s a pretty good bet that that Fischer got the word to back-off Franklin Little League from Alderman Steve Olson (Fischer’s BFF), who was likely “persuaded” to get the "message" to Fischer, from the very politically-connected, David Bartels, former Franklin Little League President and current board member.

This was obviously all Fischer needed to push young, Devin Baehr and his Father Carl, under the bus.

Live and learn.

Monday
27Jul2009

Observation Post: All Is Fair In Love & Blogs?

OBSERVING THE MOVEMENTS OF THE MISGUIDED

After dozens of attempts and years of trying, FranklinNOW’s “Blogger-in Chief” Kevin Fischer, has finally succeeded in “jumping the shark” and the unintended consequences of his "courageous" feat may not be welcomed by this long-time bully of the blogs.

In the comments section of a recent post the “Voice of Franklin,” saw fit to write the following about Freshman School Board member Janet Evans, a favorite target of Fischer’s adolescent, name-calling:

You see, now that I am safely in office, I don't dare write about anything controversial or provocative. Instead, I'll just pose for holy pictures, thank you very much ("I am your voice"). I would rather focus on the next Franklin school bake sale or car wash. I have become Barney of the Blogs! I am now Suzy Cream Cheese!

So, what was the intent behind these latest words of wisdom from this irrelevant, politico groupie? Since I’m not a veteran broadcaster like Fischer, I’m not exactly sure. Is it possible that this legislative aide to laughingstock, state Sen. Mary Lazich was sending his readers some sort of cryptic message? Beats me, I'm as clueless as Sen. Lazich on this, but here are my takeaways.

  1. Franklin schools bake sales, car washes and Franklin school board members who participate in them: BAD! Dunk Tank fundraisers and Wisconsin state senators who participate in them: GOOD!
  2. Janet Evans—according to Fischer—is “Barney of the Blogs!” But which “Barney” was Fischer referring to; big purple, loveable, Barney or town drunk Barney? The latter would certainly be ironic.
  3. For "dessert," the bomb-throwing Fischer sexually degrades Janet Evans by referring to her as a "Suzy Cream Cheese!" Could this derogatory remark be a clue to Fischer's past? Is Kevin Fischer actually an old, closet hippie?!

All kidding aside, the least Fischer should do is apologize to Janet Evans and her family for his vular, public comment. And FranklinNOW editor Mark Maley should publically apologize, as well, for allowing this comment to be posted in the first place.

Finally, BATTLE JOINED can’t help but wonder how Kevin Fischer would react to his brand of personally degrading “commentary,” were it directed at his co-blogger and wife, Jennifer. Is all fair in love & blogs?

Friday
24Jul2009

Parents of Private School Students Rightfully Get Gift Horse 

According to FranklinNOW more than 50 supporters of private school busing showed up at Wednesday night’s school board meeting with hopes that board members would reverse an earlier decision to cut $90,000 from its 2009-10 budget for private school student busing. Facing estimated state funding cuts of more 15 percent the school board was not swayed.

Although affected families were unhappy with the decision, Franklin taxpayers are not completely off the hook when it comes to funding private school student transportation. As school board member Janet Evans pointed out in a recent blog post, the district will spend approximately $40,000 in the coming school year, an increase of nearly $7500 over last year, to compensate the families of 118 private school students for transportation.

While congratulating the board for upholding its earlier decision, BATTLE JOINED was a bit confused by this statement attributed to School Board President Dave Szychlinski in the FranklinNOW article:

“There would likely be more budget cuts made before earlier cuts would be restored.”

We agree that more budget cuts are needed; however, the school board should not offset spending cuts by “restoring earlier cuts.” As for making up for funding cuts we recommend serious spending cuts.

Thursday
23Jul2009

Mark Carstensen: “We Are Overregulated Here In Franklin.”

Well, who the HELL are you… Mark Carstensen?  Who, who, who, who?

This past Tuesday the Franklin Common Council, chaired by Common Council President Steve Taylor, was presented with a concept review for Sacred Heart at Monastery Lake, a proposed four-story apartment building designed to house 180 residents, including active and retired priests, as well as members of the general public older than 55.

BATTLE JOINED (BATJO) attended this meeting and listened to Mark Carstensen’s (Mark Carstensen Construction and Development) presentation, and frankly, was put-off by the bully-like behavior Carstensen exhibited toward District 3 Alderwoman, Kristen Wilhelm, who is my Alderman. I can’t help but wonder how different Carstensen’s tone and behavior might have been were he addressing AlderMAN “CHRISTOPHER Wilhelm,” with a physical stature closer to his own.

What follows is Carstensen’s tirade in response to Wilhelm’s motion, and discussion to require Mark Carstensen Construction and Development to obtain a review of its project from SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission), something this company has done before by Carstensen’s own admission:

“This city is overregulated the way it is and we don’t need another level of complications to this city. With all due respect Ald. Wilhelm, you say that SEWRPC is middle of the road and it’s no problem; this, that and the other. We put together a very substantial, complete, package; we don’t think that we need to run it past each and every agency out there, especially when they’re not, um, needed at this point, and frankly, ah, they have no jurisdiction. We, we, run by the rules. It’s very difficult to operate in Franklin. The Franklin’s NRPP [Natural Resource Protection Plan] does not overlap with the requirements from the DNR [Department of Natural Resources], don’t overlap with requirements from the [U.S.] Army Corps of Engineers, ah, you say that they’re very middle of the ground, that they’re very benign. I can resurrect a letter from them that I received on the Shoppes of Wyndham Village that was more of an editorial than a simple, ‘hey let’s give ya some advice here,’ to the point that there was actually very pointed out to me that, if it was two years later, there’s absolutely no way that this development would ever be built where you want it to be built—period.

We don’t need this, this, this is, this is a development that’s needed in every aspect that we pointed out this evening, and I’ll take this opportunity, now that you’ve brought it out, Ms. Wilhelm, that we are overregulated her in Franklin. Your UDO [Unified Development Ordinance] is the most difficult document to ever go through, and you can ask anybody that’s worked in this city. You don’t need anymore than that. And if you pass the UDO, you pass the Army Corps of Engineers, you pass the DNR, how much more do you need? That’s my, that’s my response.”

Aside from Carstensen’s downright arrogance and out-and-out contempt for Franklin’s UDO, which under Wisconsin State Law is enacted with the express purpose, under SECTION 15-1.0103, “to promote the health, safety, morals, prosperity, aesthetics, and general welfare of the City of Franklin...,” and thereby protecting Franklin property owners.

Follows is BATJO's digital recording of Mr. Carstensen’s comments directed at Ald. Wilhelm.

As you listen to this 5:26 exchange, ask yourself—as I did—why in the hell would the Mayor and Aldermen Olson, Solomon and Taylor, supposed city leaders, allow this contractor to say, without objection, the things Carstensen said about our city and Franklin’s UDO, a document most of these gentlemen had a hand in drafting AND approving?

And why didn’t the Chair, Common council Steve Taylor, direct Carstensen to address the Common Council, and not single out Ald. Wilhelm in his remarks? I can see no excuse for this show of weakness to a developer, hometown-boy or otherwise.

Maybe you’ll be able to find one as you listen to the recording.

 

CARSTENSEN
brought to you by Livescribe

 

To quote The Who and with “all due respect” to Mr. Carstensen, how about you go “stagger back to the underground,” or better yet, to quote a friend and fellow Franklin resident:

“If Franklin is so ‘overregulated’ and our UDO ‘the most difficult document to ever go through,’ maybe Carstensen should be shown the city limit.”

I couldn’t agree more completely.

Tuesday
21Jul2009

Skeletons Just Beginning To Somersault From City Hall Closets 

In the shoplifting case, Lewandowski pleaded no contest to retail theft, an ordinance violation, from the Franklin Wal-Mart on Aug. 28, 1998. She was found guilty and paid a $283 fine, according to Franklin Municipal Court.

ROSEANN LEWANDOWSKIThat is the last paragraph in JSOnline’s story about former Franklin School Board President Roseann Lewandowski, now charged with stealing $990 from a "close friend of 20 years," including $880 in Franklin Little League funds from the same woman's home May 21.

BATTLE JOINED has a few concerns with, and questions for, City leaders after reading that paragraph. The same holds true for the Franklin School Board during the time Lewandowski served on the Board.

In a community the size of Franklin for anyone to believe that the Mayor and the Franklin Common Council did not know that in 1998, Lewandowski plead no contest to retail theft from the FRANKLIN Wal-Mart, was found guilty and paid a $283 fine, in FRANKLIN MUNICIPAL COURT, would require "a willing suspension of disbelief."

Lewandowski was president of the School Board before resigning for “personal reasons” in 2002. She was first elected in 1992.

In 1998, did the Franklin School Board cover-up the fact that Lewandowski was found guilty of the Wal-Mart theft, permitting her to continue to serve until 2002?

Lewandowski served on the city's 50th Anniversary Committee in 2005, the Personnel Committee until 2006, and most recently on the Fair Commission until her “resignation” the other day.

Did the Mayor nominate Lewandowski, and the Common Council approve her appointment to these committees, covering-up or ignoring the fact that in 1998, she was found guilty in Franklin Municipal Court of retail theft?

Futhermore, is this latest theft just the tip of the iceberg? How close is Lewandowski to Mayor Taylor or any Common Council members, present or past? Was Lewandowski part of the infamous FCRL (Franklin Citizens for Responsible Leadership) charged with campaign finance violations in 2006, and subsequently ordered to disband in 2008? And finally, how close is Lewandowski with current or past members of the Franklin School Board?

Stay tuned...

Tuesday
21Jul2009

Superintendent Patz & Company: All In All, You’re Just Another Brick In The Wall

A joint BATTLE JOINED-Pink Floyd message to Franklin School Board members, Superintendent Steve Patz, and his cadre of America History revisionists...

Tuesday
21Jul2009

Observation Post: Slammer Time?

OBSERVING THE MOVEMENTS OF THE MISGUIDED

BATJO ( BATTLE JOINED) observed the following and rather odd headline in FranklinNOW: 'Nanny cam' brings theft case against Franklin community leader, and asks; wasn’t stealing more than $900 what really brought charges against "community leader" and apparent kleptomaniac, Roseanne Lewandowski?

And while very curious, BATJO has no desire to observe nanny cam video of Lewandowski stuffing anything in her bra.  If Lewandowski is sentenced to time in the “big house,” its worth noting that she won’t have to leave Franklin.  How lucky is that?

Monday
20Jul2009

A One-way Ticket To Palookaville For Franklin?

“You don't understand! I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I could've been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am, let's face it!”

In 2007 the City of Franklin ranked 90th on Money Magazine’s annual list of the Top 100 Best Places to Live. In 2008, only cities with populations between 50,000 and 300,000 were eligible for the Best Places to Live List. Although a “contender” in 2009, 11 cities scored a decisive “knock-out” against the one-time, Top 100 champ-turned-bum; stripping Franklin of its title.

So now, in addition to the New Berlin School Board dropping Franklin’s Board of Education Board—on the issue of school taxes—much like Ali dropped Foreman, the City of New Berlin, a virtual sister-city to Franklin, leaped seven spots on the Top 100 List from 41 in 2007, to 34 this year.

While City of Franklin leaders from Mayor Taylor; who describes Franklin as “Magnificent” (watch Mayor’s “This is Franklin” video on FranklinNOW), to long-time Alderman, Steve Olson, among others on the common council, “talk” about the “$2 billion” Joint 27th Street Corridor Project—a BOOMGAARD-turned-BOONDOGGLE—and point to the “success” of Franklin Business Park, New Berlin’s leaders are consistently delivering results.

The statistics used in Money Magazine’s 2009, side-by-side comparison of the two cities indicates how similar they are with the noticeable exception of 2000-2008 Job growth performance. However, based upon the following headlines, 2009 is looking rather bleak for Franklin:

Magnificent?

Friday
17Jul2009

Franklin School Board Should Eliminate Private School Busing

FranklinNOW blogger Kevin Fischer's quarrel with FPS’ plans to save Franklin taxpayers $90,000 by cancelling taxpayer-funded busing for kids attending private schools, defies logic, reason, and simple common sense. And his repeated references to Franklin School Board member Janet Evans as a "rookie" is childish buffoonery, but this is nothing new coming from the guy who works for Sen. Mary "I voted against TABOR before I flip-flopped in favor of it" Lazich.

With the school district facing an expected 15.14% cut in state funding, or somewhere in the neighborhood of $2.7 million, the board owes it to taxpayers to cut every dollar wherever possible, and that includes its plans to spend $875,000 for a fiber optic cable for the district.

Like his boss, Fischer is obviously a “skimmer,” and a poor one at that. Evans clearly outlines Contracts for Private School Pupils Only (s. 121.55(3), Wisconsin Statutes), and the logic behind the district’s decision in her post which Fischer linked in his irrelevant and irrational post.

BOTTOMLINE: The district is within its legal rights to cancel this program, and is morally obligated to do so for the majority of taxpayers, as well as the families and students it serves.

Thursday
16Jul2009

Indispensible Supports of Political Prosperity

Some Not-So Final Thoughts Concerning BC and BCE

In part two of this series I recounted how in an email to Franklin Schools Superintendent Steve Patz, I wrote:

As an educator I’m sure you know that for our Founding Fathers, Judeo-Christian values played a foundational role in the creation of America. For evidence, one need not look further that our Declaration of Independence…

I hindsight I should have used the word “religion” in place of “Judeo Christian,” in pointing out the great importance—and historical fact—which the Founding Fathers originally attached to the role of religion in creating our unique form of government. However, using the word “religion,” does not change my primary argument that there needs to be set policy in our schools when it comes to controversial subjects. No Teacher’s personal or political beliefs should ever enter into the equation when it comes to teaching History, and MORE IMPORTANTLY American History.

To be clear about my view, I’ll repeat what I wrote in part one when I brought up the subject of FPS teachers teaching BCE (Before Common Era) versus BC (Before Christ):

… Not one for political correctness and far from a religious fanatic, as a student of history I emailed Franklin School Board President David Szychlinski for an explanation…

CONTINUED...

More than anything else, I firmly believe that Superintendent Patz’s dizzying explanations and defense for the lack of a policy on this subject, has more to do with “political correctness,” a misguided understanding of the First Amendment, and insufficient knowledge of our Founding Fathers’ political frame of reference when they penned the Constitution.

In 1787, the same year that the Constitution was written and approved by Congress, that same Congress passed the well-known Northwest Ordinance, believed to be one of the most significant achievements of the Congress of the Confederation.

The Franklin School Board and Superintendent Patz would likely pass out if they new what was contained in Article 3 of this document considered a “primary document in American history” by the Library of Congress:

Article 3: Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged…

This view was further emphasized by President Washington in his Farewell Address in 1796:

...Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness...

This entire matter of BC versus BCE has provided me with a revealing—and not so pretty— glimpse of how this school board does business. With the exception of Janet Evans, its members, including its officers and the members of its Curriculum Committee, have shown me nothing but an unwillingness to address my concerns as a Franklin elector and parent.

BOE members Szychlinski, Larson, Traylor, Witkowski, Bialk, and Works, apparently could not be bothered with my concerns even though BOE member Janet Evans forwarded the following email to the appropriate members of the Curriculum Committee which includes BOE Vice President Debbie Larson:

Janet:

Can you please tell me whether my request that the Franklin School Board will be take up a discussion pertaining to the use of BC versus BCE in the classroom, with the goal of issuing a written policy statement on the subject, and if so, when?

Thank you for following up on this for me.

As for the other BOE members; ignoring me will not make me go away.

Wednesday
15Jul2009

Is There Room For Teachers’ Personal Preferences in the Classroom?

This is part two of a three part story.

Part One: Before Common Era?

Email from Patz to Keller: I have a little information for you after getting in contact with some staff members today. Our textbooks use the term BC but teachers do reference BCE so students are aware of it's meaning. We do not advocate for either term and generally use what is found in our textbooks for reference with students. Since a textbook is not the curriculum and multiple medias are used for instruction, we feel we are addressing the issue appropriately since student exposure is also very important.

Hope this helps.

Keller to Patz: Thanks for getting back to me, but your answers to [my] questions are a little troubling to me and I’ll tell you why.

You told me in an earlier email on this subject that, “I did speak to our curriculum director, who is new this year, and she has never heard of these terms being used.”

In this email you wrote, “Our textbooks use the term BC but teachers do reference BCE so students are aware of its meaning,” and yet you also wrote, the “curriculum director has never heard of these terms being used.”

Common sense suggests to me that there’s something not quite right here; wouldn’t you agree?

You also wrote that when it comes to teaching BC or BEC, “We do not advocate for either term and generally use what is found in our textbooks.”

Have you considered advocating BC over BCE since it’s used in the textbooks?

Have you ever considered that by not creating a standard of advocating one term over the other, that one teacher may be teaching BC, and another, BCE, or both?

Does this body’s lack of direction to its teachers reflect a “politically correct” desire to avoid advocating “BC” because it’s an acronym for “Before Christ?”

Until my daughter mentioned “BCE,” I had no idea what it meant or that in
Franklin public Schools it was being taught along side ”BC.”

As an educator I’m sure you know that for our Founding Fathers, Judeo-Christian values played a foundational role in the creation of America. For evidence, one need not look further that our Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

CONTINUED...

Steve, as Independence Day approaches, I hope the Franklin School Board will honor our Founding Fathers and American history, and consider standardizing the use of BC. There is no room for teachers’ personal preference in the classroom.

Patz to Keller: Actually, no, I don't agree that something "isn't quite right here". We don't consider advocating for particular positions but do feel that our teachers are professionals and will appropriately address any issue that may be controversial to someone while in the classroom. Additionally, not everyone shares the opinion of others so advocating for one side would exclude the opposing opinion.

Lastly, this body has a clear direction and your opinion to the contrary is just that, your opinion.

Keller to Patz: I can’t say that I agree with your apparent blind faith that teachers will “appropriately address any issue that may be controversial to someone while in the classroom.” One teacher’s personal view of what’s appropriate or suitable may not be appropriate in another’s view. Isn’t that why we need policy?

Also, based on your response, I believe you more than likely misunderstood me when I asked: “Does this body’s lack of direction to its teachers reflect a ‘politically correct’ desire to avoid advocating 'BC' because it’s an acronym for 'Before Christ?'”, when you wrote: “Lastly, this body has a clear direction and your opinion to the contrary is just that, your opinion.”

I was questioning the board’s direction to teachers, not the clarity of this body’s overall direction. The board’s lack of clear-cut direction to teachers with regard to controversial subject matter like this is—in my opinion—irresponsible. It’s clear to me from your emails that had I not brought this matter to your attention in the first place, you like me and your curriculum director, had no idea how BC and BCE were being taught in FPS classrooms. Would you agree with that? A curious person would ask what other controversial subject matter is being left to the professional discretion of teachers. In my opinion that’s no way to run a school district. By the way, you never directly answered my question.

When it comes to the school board taking a stance on this or any other matter, your point that, “not everyone shares the opinion of others so advocating for one side would exclude the opposing opinion,” is, with all due respect, rather ridiculous. Schools cannot present every side to every issue. There will always be opposing views.

School board members are elected to make myriad decisions, some difficult, some not so difficult; some popular, some unpopular. You were hired by the board—and thereby, the people—to carryout its decisions. And I find that with the usual exception of Janet Evans, this board appears to be taking a backseat on this issue. That is not what they were elected to do.

By your emails I have no idea whether you are including board members in our discussions. If they have been copied, why don’t your emails show this?

Patz to Keller: I will not be recommending anything to the board regarding your issue. To me, asking a board to react to what your children allegedly heard 10 years ago is not appropriate. Additionally, your continued sarcasm and criticism of the district, myself and the board is counterproductive. The board has, and always will deal with controversial issues when it's appropriate to do so.

Keller to Patz: As a Franklin citizen and taxpayer I find your comments arrogant, self-serving, and ironically—counterproductive.

If you reread my email, you will see that I was not asking you to as you wrote, [ask] the board to “react to what your children allegedly heard 10 years ago is not appropriate.”

Frankly, whether you feel my concern is appropriate or not, is irrelevant to me since I wasn’t addressing you. I wrote:

By copy of this email to Franklin School Board members, I am asking that a discussion pertaining to the use of BC versus BCE in the classroom, be taken up by Board, with the goal of issuing a written policy statement on the subject…” As I wrote in an earlier email, there is no room for teachers’ personal preference in the classroom.

Do you oversee the school board, or do its elected board members?

Be assured that regardless of your opinion as to what you or the school board deem as “controversial issues,” I will continue to exercise my First Amendment Right to Free Speech when, and any way I see fit. That includes supporting or criticizing the school board or its members, including you as superintendent.

We'll have some final thoughts tomorrow.

Wednesday
15Jul2009

Observation Post: Look Who's Taking Pot Shots At WISN

OBSERVING THE MOVEMENTS OF THE MISGUIDED ON A VARIETY OF SUBJECTS

After reading Nice job by Channel 12 could have been nicer, we’ve observed that someone might be just a little miffed at WISN.

If you read the post you'll see that there was really no need for WISN Channel 12 to show the entire video of Sam Last, a 6-year old brain tumor patient who thanks to Make-A-Wish Foundation sang the national anthem before Sunday’s Brewers game at Miller Park. “Bent out of shape at WISN" complained:

“Would it have hurt to show the entire video on the 5:30 news? How about showing it earlier than 10:50 when most kids (including Sam) were probably asleep.”

Oddly enough, “Bent” includes in his post, a link to the WISN video of Sam singing the national anthem in its entirety, something Sam and his family could have easily watched, as well.

OP is surprised that “Bent” didn’t also complain that the Brewers lost to the Dodgers, 7-4.

Tuesday
14Jul2009

Before Common Era?

“Before Common Era” is a term that until recently, I had never heard of. I was introduced to it when “Before Common Era,” somehow came up in conversation with my 19-year old daughter; a product of Franklin Public Schools, and a 2007 graduate of Franklin High School.

For the “uneducated” like me, “Before Common Era,” (BCE) is a non-religious alternative to the use of BC in designating the first period of the Gregorian Calendar.

I was fortunate, like other baby-boomers, to have grown up and gone to school in a “politically incorrect” time in America. Sadly, today’s schools sometimes place political correctness above historical fact, and our kids end up on the receiving end of historical revisionism fostered by the public education system.

Not one for political correctness and far from a religious fanatic, as a student of history I emailed Franklin School Board President David Szychlinski for an explanation, writing:

“I was surprised to learn from my 19-year old daughter—FHS class of 2007—that in elementary school, she was taught world/ancient history using the term “Before Common Era“ (BCE), a non-religious alternative to the use of “BC.”

Is this the case, and if so, please find out and tell me WHEN and WHY this decision was implemented into FPS curriculum?”

Szychlinski forwarded my email to Superintendent Steve Patz, asking him to “respond to my inquiry,” and included all school board members in his email.

CONTINUED...

Follows is the email exchange I had with Superintendent Patz:

Patz to Keller: With staff and principals gone for the summer it is difficult to inquire and respond to your request from an issue that occurred two years ago. I will look in to this with our curriculum director and see what information I can gather. What elementary school did she attend?

Keller to Patz: To clarify, the issue didn’t occur two years ago, my daughter graduated two years ago. Also, my son who will be a senior in fall confirmed what my daughter told me.

To answer your question, my daughter and son attended Pleasant View and Robinwood.

If Dave didn’t forward my original email to you, here’s my question:

WHEN and WHY this decision [BCE vs. BC] was implemented into FPS curriculum?

I would imagine this decision was not taken lightly and I would expect the district would document its decision. Your decision to involve the curriculum director seems prudent considering staff and principals [are] gone for the summer.

Thanks for getting back to me; I look forward to you getting to the bottom of this, soon.

Patz to Keller: Since this occurred a minimum of six years ago for your son and almost ten years or so for your daughter, to find out about a curricular decision that long ago will be difficult, if not impossible, since teachers and other personnel may have changed over time. Additionally, this reference may never have been adopted by anyone but could have been used by a singular teacher. At any rate, I will see what I can find out. I did speak to our curriculum director, who is new this year, and she has never heard of these terms being used.

Keller to Patz: I can appreciate the difficulty you and your staff may have in determining whether this is a years-old, curriculum decision, or a practice or personal decision undertaken by a single teacher, so I’ll cut to the chase by asking you to directly answer the following questions:

  1. Currently, do FPS teachers and/or teacher’s aides, use “Before Common Era” (BCE) a non-religious alternative to “Before Christ,” (BC), to designate the first period of the Gregorian calendar (the era of prehistory and much of antiquity)?
  2. Expanding this; currently, do FPS teachers and/or teacher’s aides, use CE, as a replacement for AD (Anno Domini), “The Year of Our Lord,” in their teaching?
  3. Does FPS advocate the use of BC versus BCE, in its curriculum, and if so, has this been directly communicated to its teachers and administrators, and do FPS history text books use BC or BCE?

Thanks for sorting these things out for me.

Patz to Keller: I will research this and get back to you when I have something.

Tomorrow, Part 2: Is There Room For Teachers’ Personal Preferences in the Classroom?

Tuesday
14Jul2009

All the Lights Are on But Nobody’s Home

BATTLE JOINED summer intern, “Toby the Intern,” recently took a “midnight ride” though Franklin Business Park on his trusty steed “Ranger,” and -- to his surprise -- found that ALL the many, “fancy-schmancy” street lights in this 425 acre business park were on, but "99.9%" of the businesses “weren’t home!”

Although just a summer intern, the ever-curious Toby wonders why Franklin Business Park, a corporate development for office and light industrial use, has its street lights burning all night? And make no mistake; there are a lot of “fancy-schmancy” street lights.

It may come as a surprise to some that Franklin Business Park is owned by MLG Commercial and developed by MLG Development in partnership with the City of Franklin Community Development Authority (chaired by Mayor Taylor), and the City of Franklin (Franklin citizens).

With ever-rising energy costs and outrageously high property taxes in this city, any city leader(s) with an ounce of common sense would look for ways to reduce spending; not waste taxpayer dollars. It’s apparent to Toby and BATTLE JOINED that this is too much to expect from Franklin’s leaders.

Monday
13Jul2009

$103 Million in “Shovel-Ready” Infrastructure Projects Looming Over Franklin?

When President Obama signed the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (so-called stimulus bill) into law last February, $80 billion of this bill’s funding was allocated to the states for critical, urgent "shovel-ready” local projects for such things as transit, infrastructure, housing, airports, and schools. We’re now seeing that billions of taxpayer dollars are being thrown at projects never intended to receive stimulus funding in the first place, like beautification projects, museums, parks, and street lamps.

In a May article, ReasonOnline wrote that in December 2008, the U.S. Conference of Mayors submitted a wish list of ‘shovel-ready” projects for 779 cities totaling $149.7 billion for 18,750 projects.

In February in a post entitled U.S. Conference of Mayors Drafted $73.2 Billion Wish List, we noted that Mayor Tom Taylor had submitted a detailed list of the City’s “shovel-ready” projects to Madison, requesting a total of $103 million in federal stimulus funding. The request was ultimately rejected. Franklin blogger Greg Kowalski addressed Taylor’s wish list, as well.

Now, with all of this in mind, BATTLE JOINED is curious.  If the City is truly facing $103 million in critical, urgent "shovel-ready” infrastructure projects, as detailed in Mayor Taylor’s request, how does Taylor intend to pay for these supposed critical projects? And if the Mayor’s project’s were not, in fact "shovel-ready,” how can he justify requesting $103 million in federal tax dollars?

Common sense thinking tells me there is something is very wrong here.

Monday
13Jul2009

Observation Post: "Where's Fischer?"

OBSERVING THE MOVEMENTS OF THE MISGUIDED ON A VARIETY OF SUBJECTS

WISN Radio talk show host Mark Belling hosted the Rush Limbaugh Show this past Monday and Tuesday while Limbaugh vacationed.

In Belling's absense BATTLE JOINED observed that "award-winning veteran broadcaster" Kevin Fischer, "who has been seen and heard on Milwaukee TV and radio stations for nearly three decades," was not heard filling in on Newstalk 1130 WISN for Belling, as he has in the past.

BATTLE JOINED curiously observed that  time-stamps no longer appear on FranklinNOW bloggers’ blog posts, making it difficult  for readers to know when bloggers are blogging on "company time" or drunk-blogging.

And finally, BATTLE JOINED observed that an American President who has said I have "the blood of Africa within me," praised and scolded the continent of his ancestors Saturday, asserting forces of tyranny and corruption must yield if Africa is to achieve its promise.

America’s Founding Fathers could not be reached for comment.

Friday
10Jul2009

BATTLE JOINED Follow-Up: All Quiet On the City Hall Front

I recently spoke with Brian Tubbs, President, Franklin Little League, regarding the $920 that was stolen from the league and whether the league plans to file charges. Mr. Tubbs assured me in no uncertain terms that he will be pressing charges against the Franklin resident accused of this theft.

Mr. Tubbs also provided me with a number of details surrounding the theft—some off the record, which of course, I will not discuss until they become public record. In the meantime it will be interesting to see whether political influence from City Hall will intervene to prevent “one of their own” from going to trial. Based upon what I have been told, a plea agreement seems totally unnecessary and would not serve justice.

Finally, as of this writing the “perp” is still being shown as a member of a Franklin commission that is involved with fees—not very smart in my book. My email to the Alderman represented on this commission, asking whether under the circumstances, the “perp” will be removed from this commission, has gone unanswered since Tuesday.

Thursday
09Jul2009

"Nice Shiner!" Will City Hall Take One For The Team?

For months rumors have been swirling around Franklin “Payton Place” over the following two-sentence theft report posted May 27on FranklinNOW:

About $800 belonging to Franklin Little League was taken from the 6000 block of West Glen Court on May 22. In addition, two thefts of $60 were reported at the same address in April and May.

Who would knowingly steal a combined $920, over three separate occasions, from the kids in Franklin Little League?

The answer to that question might shock some in City Hall and assorted Franklin "elites," but I have a feeling that most of that crowd already knows the answer to this question.

As in all such matters in this great country of ours, the “perp” is innocent in until proven guilty in a court of law.  But the "court of public opinion" isn't bound by this tenet.